Most Viewed Pages.

    Archive for Media

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Connecting the dots of this climate change crisis” was written by Bill McKibben for TomDispatch, part of the Guardian Comment Network, for guardian.co.uk on Friday 4th May 2012 08.00 UTC

    The Williams river was so languid and lovely last Saturday morning that it was almost impossible to imagine the violence with which it must have been running on 28 August 2011. Yet the evidence was all around: sand piled high on its banks, trees still scattered as if by a giant’s fist, and most obvious of all, a utilitarian temporary bridge where, for 140 years, a graceful covered bridge had spanned the water.

    The YouTube video of that bridge crashing into the raging river was Vermont’s iconic image from its worst disaster in memory, the record flooding that followed Hurricane Irene’s rampage through the state in August 2011. It claimed dozens of lives, as it cut a more than $1bn swath of destruction across the eastern US.

    I watched it on TV in Washington, DC, just after emerging from jail, having been arrested at the White House during mass protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. Since Vermont is my home, it took the theoretical – the ever more turbulent, erratic, and dangerous weather that the tar sands pipeline from Canada would help ensure – and made it all too concrete. It shook me bad.

    And I am not the only one.

    New data (pdf) released last month by researchers at Yale and George Mason universities show that a lot of Americans are growing far more concerned about climate change, precisely because they are drawing the links between freaky weather, a climate kicked off-kilter by a fossil-fuel guzzling civilization, and their own lives. After a year with a record number of multibillion dollar weather disasters, seven in ten Americans now believe that “global warming is affecting the weather.”

    No less striking, 35% of the respondents reported that extreme weather had affected them personally in 2011. As Yale’s Anthony Laiserowitz told the New York Times, “People are starting to connect the dots.”

    Which is what we must do. As long as this remains one abstract problem in the long list of problems, we will never get to it. There will always be something going on each day that is more important, including, if you are facing flood or drought, the immediate danger.

    But in reality, climate change is actually the biggest thing that is going on every single day. If we could only see that pattern, we would have a fighting chance. It is like one of those trompe l’oeil puzzles where you can only catch sight of the real picture by holding it a certain way.

    So, this weekend, we will be doing our best to hold our planet a certain way so that the most essential pattern is evident. At 350.org, we are organizing a global day of action that is all about dot-connecting; in fact, you can follow the action at climatedots.org.

    The day will begin in the Marshall Islands of the far Pacific, where the sun first rises on our planet, and where locals will hold a daybreak underwater demonstration on their coral reef already threatened by rising seas. They will hold, in essence, a giant dot – and so will our friends in Bujumbura, Burundi, where March flooding destroyed 500 homes. In Dakar, Senegal, they’ll mark the tidal margins of recent storm surges. In Adelaide, Australia, activists will host a “dry creek regatta” to highlight the spreading drought down under.

    Pakistani farmers – some of the millions driven from their homes by unprecedented flooding over the last two years – will mark the day on the banks of the Indus; in Ayuthaya, Thailand, Buddhist monks will protest next to a temple destroyed by December’s epic deluges that also left the capital, Bangkok, awash.

    Activists in Ulanbataar will focus on the ongoing effects of drought in Mongolia. In Daegu, South Korea, students will gather with bags of rice and umbrellas to connect the dots between climate change, heavy rains, and the damage caused to South Korea’s rice crop in recent years. In Amman, Jordan, Friends of the Earth Middle East will be forming a climate dot on the shores of the Dead Sea to draw attention to how climate change-induced drought has been shrinking that sea.

    In Herzliya, Israel, people will form a dot on the beach to stand in solidarity with island nations and coastal communities around the world that are feeling the impact of climate change. In newly-freed Libya, students will hold a teach-in. In Oman, elders will explain how the weather along the Persian Gulf has shifted in their lifetimes.

    There will be actions in the cloud forests of Costa Rica, and in the highlands of Peru where drought has wrecked the lives of local farmers. In Monterrey, Mexico, they’ll recall last year’s floods that did nearly $2bn in damage. In Chamonix, France, climbers will put a giant red dot on the melting glaciers of the Alps.

    And across North America, as the sun moves westward, activists in Halifax, Canada, will “swim for survival” across its bay to highlight rising sea levels, while high school students in Nashville, Tennessee will gather on a football field inundated by 2011′s historic killer floods. 

    In Portland, Oregon, city dwellers will hold an umbrella-decorating party to commemorate March’s record rains. In Bandelier, New Mexico, firefighters in full uniform will remember last year’s record forest fires and unveil the new solar panels on their fire station. In Miami, Manhattan, and Maui, citizens will line streets that scientists say will eventually be underwater. In the high Sierra, on one of the glaciers steadily melting away, protesters will unveil a giant banner with just two words, a quote from that classic of western children’s literature, The Wizard of Oz: “I’m melting” it will say, in letters three-stories high.

    This is a full-on fight between information and disinformation, between the urge to witness and the urge to cover up. The fossil fuel industry has funded endless efforts to confuse people, to leave an impression that nothing much is going on. But as with the tobacco industry before them, the evidence has simply gotten too strong. Once you saw enough people die of lung cancer, you made the connection.

    The situation is the same today. Now, it is not just the scientists and the insurance industry; it is your neighbors. Even pleasant weather starts to seem weird. Fifteen thousand US temperature records were broken, mainly in the east and midwest, in the month of March alone, as a completely unprecedented heat wave moved across the continent. Most people I met enjoyed the rare experience of wearing shorts in winter, but they were still shaking their heads. Something was clearly wrong and they knew it.

    The one institution in our society that is not likely to be much help in spreading the news is … the news. Studies show our newspapers and TV channels paying ever less attention to our shifting climate. In fact, in 2011, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox spent twice as much time discussing Donald Trump as climate change. Do not expect representatives from Saturday’s Connect the Dots day to show up on Sunday’s talk shows. Over the last three years, those inside-the-Beltway extravaganzas have devoted 98 minutes total to the planet’s biggest challenge. Last year, in fact, all the Sunday talk shows spent exactly nine minutes of Sunday talking time on climate change – and here is a shock: all of it was given over to Republican politicians in the great denial sweepstakes.

    So, here’s a prediction: next Sunday, no matter how big and beautiful the demonstrations may be that we’re mounting across the world, “Face the Nation” and “Meet the Press” won’t be connecting the dots. They will be gassing along about Newt Gingrich’s retirement from the presidential race or Mitt Romney’s coming nomination, and many of the commercials will come from oil companies lying about their environmental efforts.

    If we are going to tell this story – and it is the most important story of our time – we are going to have to tell it ourselves. 

    • Follow Comment is free on Twitter @commentisfree

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “TV ad revenue hits record thanks to Google and Groupon” was written by Mark Sweney, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 7th March 2012 07.58 UTC

    Television advertising revenue in the UK increased by 2.2% year on year to a record £4.36bn in 2011, as advertisers such as internet giants Google and Groupon ploughed millions into TV commercials for the first time.

    The UK TV market was buoyed by 887 new or returning advertisers – defined as those who have not run commercials for at least five years – according to research conducted by TV marketing body Thinkbox and Nielsen Media Research.

    New advertisers, which accounted for £113m or 2.6% of TV ad spend in the UK, included Google, Groupon, Ann Summers, Jimmy Choo and British Airways new frequent-flyer brand Avios.

    Google, which has historically shied away from TV and brand advertising, spent £5.2m on TV ads in the UK last year.

    This represents 23% of the £22.5m that Google spent in the UK on all forms of advertising – including internet, outdoor, press and radio – according to figures from Nielsen.

    Google’s ad spend in the UK has increased more than seven-fold in just three years. In 2009 Google spent £3m, in 2010 this more than doubled to £6.6m and then almost quadrupled to £22.5m last year.

    The rocketing ad spend is a far cry from Google’s previous ethos with Eric Schmidt, the former chief executive, admitting on Twitter that “hell has indeed frozen over” when the search giant purchased one of the world most expensive ad slots to run a commercial during the Super Bowl in 2010.

    Notable work in the UK last year includes ad agency BBH’s campaign for Google Chrome featuring Jamal Edwards, the teenager behind urban music site SBTV, which ran with the strapline “The web is what you make of it”.

    Google UK also uses M&C Saatchi for marketing and advertising communications around the issue of privacy and has a prolific in-house ad department called Creative Labs.

    Tess Alps, the chief executive of Thinkbox, said the rise in UK TV ad revenue was an encouraging performance particularly given that in 2010 the market rose 16% year on year in the recovery following the downturn, making a further rise last year all that more difficult to achieve.

    “The strength of linear TV advertising investment reflects commercial TV’s record viewing and the further acknowledgement by advertisers of its ability to create business profit,” said Alps.

    The top spending category remained retailers, followed by the entertainment and leisure sector, and finance.

    Telecoms companies increased ad spend by 28.8% year on year, travel and transport rose 27% and the never-ending battle between comparison websites saw TV ad spend rise 21.5% year on year in this sector.

    In January, Thinkbox produced its annual TV viewing report, showing UK viewers watched an average of four hours and two minutes of television per day. Each viewer watched an average of 47 TV ads per day in 2011.

    • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

    • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)
    Plans to send warning letters to suspected illegal file-sharers have been put off until at least 2014, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport confirms.
    Categories : Uncategorized
    Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “US military criticised for secrecy over death of Afghan BBC correspondent” was written by Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 25th April 2012 12.33 UTC

    US military secrecy over the death of a BBC correspondent shot dead by US forces during a Taliban attack caused needless distress to his family and sparked fears of a cover-up, a report into the shooting has said.

    Ahmed Omed Khpulwak, 25, an Afghan national who worked as a BBC stringer in southern Uruzgan province, died when the local radio and television offices where he worked were attacked last July.

    Khpulwak was shot dead by US soldiers who mistook him for an insurgent when they spotted him hiding in the bathroom of the building, which had been half-destroyed by suicide bombers.

    Both the Afghan government and the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) initially said Khpulwak had been killed by the Taliban, despite the questions of family members who retrieved his body.

    “Those who saw Omed’s body and the place of his death and heard police saying that foreign forces had stormed RTA [Radio Television Afghanistan] understood there was something wrong with the official account,” the report from the Afghanistan Analysts Network said.

    But when his family spoke out about suspicions that he had been killed by a foreign soldier instead – based on the state of his body and the bullet casings around it – they received death threats in anonymous phone calls, probably from people linked to a local strongman, according to the report.

    “Isaf’s failure to talk frankly with the media and Afghan population caused needless distress to Omed’s family and friends and helped spark suspicions of a cover-up,” said the report’s author, Kate Clark.

    The truth about Khpulwak’s death emerged weeks later, when the results of a US investigation were published. A redacted version of the full conclusions was released only after a freedom of information request.

    Clark’s report questions whether US troops did enough to meet their legal obligation to check there were no civilians in the offices, although it acknowledges that the soldier who shot him dead did so “with a reasonable belief that Omed was a possible suicide bomber”.

    US troops were told by a local security battalion that there were no civilians in the building, but did not seem to have made further checks, the report said. At least one fellow journalist who reached Khpulwak by phone and tried to get to the offices was turned back by Afghan and Nato forces.

    The top Nato and US commander in Afghanistan, General John Allen, endorsed investigators’ recommendations, including those “that address the need to establish whether civilians are present at the scene of any potential engagement”, a conclusion Clark said showed the importance of transparency when operations do go wrong.

    “The release of the military investigation has shown how an honest explanation of events can be a positive contribution both to accountability for civilian deaths and to improving the protection of civilians,” the report said.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “James Murdoch to step down as BSkyB chairman – live” was written by Josh Halliday and Dugald Baird, for guardian.co.uk on Tuesday 3rd April 2012 13.13 UTC

    2.11pm: Our colleague on the business desk, Rupert Neate, has this background on recent BSkyB shareholder feelings on the now-departed chairman:

    In November 44% of BSkyB’s independent shareholders voted against or abstained from voting for James Murdoch’s re-election to the board. Big institutional shareholders that voted against his reappointment included Legal and General Investment Management, the broadcaster’s third biggest shareholder, Standard Life and JP Morgan. News Corp controls 37% of voting shares in Sky so Murdoch easily achieved enough votes to continue his chairmanship.

    At the meeting Guy Jubb, head of governance at Standard Life Investments, took the unusual of standing up to tell the audience why he had voted against Murdoch. “We pointed out [to the board] that our misgivings had been heightened by the revelations of stewardship shortcomings at the News of the World, a title for which Mr Murdoch bore a measure of responsibility.” Jubb added that Standard Life was “deeply disappointed” that not a single director shared their concerns.

    News of Murdoch’s exit has had little effect on BSkyB’s shares down just 0.22% to 679.5p, valuing the company at £11.6bn.

    2.01pm: Here’s a bit of information about Nick Ferguson, the deputy chairman of BSkyB, who has been tipped up to take over at the top of the broadcaster. “He eats nails for breakfast,” a source told the Guardian.

    At one point, Ferguson queried why he – who made his money in private equity – paid less tax (proportionately) than the cleaners.

    You can read more on this here.

    1.40pm: The Guardian’s head of media, Dan Sabbagh, has written this report on Murdoch’s resignation:

    James Murdoch will step down as chairman of BSkyB shortly, after the man who had been thought of as Rupert Murdoch’s corporate heir concluded it was no longer worth hanging on and risking a critical verdict from MPs inquiring into phone hacking.

    The 39-year-old, who has been chief executive and then chairman since 2003, is understood to have made up his mind to resign the post, although BSkyB has not yet made a formal announcement to the stock exchange. By stepping down, it will mean that no Murdoch occupies a top position at the satellite broadcaster for the first time in years.

    You can read the full story here.

    1.39pm: Andrew Neil, former editor of the Sunday Times, has tweeted:

    1.37pm: BSkyB board members were only called to attend an unscheduled board meeting earlier today, reports Sky News City editor Mark Kleinman, who broke the news of Murdoch’s resignation.

    He believes that the City will welcome Murdoch’s resignation and that will be reflected in a boost to BSkyB’s share price.

    1.35pm: Jack Irvine, the former News International executive, has described Murdoch’s resignation at BSkyB chairman as a “tragedy” but that it was inevitable.

    In an interview with Sky News, Irvine said: “It’s a very wise move … it should maybe have happened a bit sooner and the appointment made is a superb one.”

    Irvine said that TV executives have to be “seen as cleaner than clean”, and adds: “It’s the right thing to do. There’s no choice to do it.”

    He praised Murdoch’s work as chairman of BSkyB and said it is a “tragedy” that his tenure has ended like this. He does not see the point of Murdoch remaining on the board of BSkyB.

    Irvine says that Rupert Murdoch “trusted people in London that he shouldn’t have trusted” and “the ship lost direction”, referring to News International.

    1.23pm: James Murdoch’s resignation comes at a crucial time for the heir apparent’s media legacy in the UK.

    It comes days ahead of a key report on phone hacking from the Commons culture, media and sport select committee, which twice questioned the younger Murdoch about what he knew about alleged impropriety at News International.

    Murdoch is also feeling the heat from the media regulator Ofcom, which recently announced it was stepping up its investigation into whether he is a “fit and proper” person to sit on the board of BSkyB.

    Murdoch will reportedly remain on the board of BSkyB, although he has stepped down as executive chairman.

    1.19pm: John Prescott has just tweeted:

    1.18pm: Here is a quick timeline of the recent developments in James Murdoch’s role in the UK:

    Today: Revealed that Murdoch is to step down as chairman of BSkyB.

    17 March: Murdoch resigns his directorship at auction house Sotheby’s.

    14 March: Murdoch writes to MPs on Commons media select committee expressing “deep regret” over News of the World phone hacking.

    29 February: Murdoch resigns as chairman of News International, publisher of the Sun and formerly News of the World.

    27 January: Murdoch quits GlaxoSmithKline board.

    1.14pm: The Guardian’s media commentator Roy Greenslade has given his reaction to the news of Murdoch’s resignation in an interview with Sky News.

    He says it was somewhat “inevitable” and adds: “I don’t think it’s a massive surprise even though the timing may be surprising. It comes ahead of giving evidence to Leveson and more significantly of the media select committee phone hacking report.”

    Greenslade adds that this raises questions over Murdoch’s position on the News Corp board.

    1.11pm: The Guardian has confirmed that Murdoch is to step down from his role as chairman of BSkyB after a board meeting later on Tuesday. Sky News City reporter Mark Kleinman broke the news shortly before 1pm.

    1.09pm: James Murdoch is to step down as chairman of BSkyB.

    The younger son of Rupert Murdoch has faced increasing pressure in the UK over what he knew about alleged phone hacking at former News of the World publisher News International.

    James was a non-executive chairman of the pay-TV giant BSkyB, of which News Corporation owns a 39.1% stake.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Jeremy Hunt denounces the UK’s ‘London-centric’ media” was written by Martin Wainwright, for guardian.co.uk on Tuesday 13th March 2012 08.03 UTC

    The culture secretary Jeremy Hunt opened the annual conference on the media in the ‘nations and regions’ in Salford last night with a ringing denunciation of the London-centric media.

    On his first visit to MediaCityUK since the BBC offices opened last year, he said that doing something about this had been his ‘passion’ since taking office. And now, the media landscape was shifting away from the magic kingdom within the M25, to an extent which London, typically in his view, underestimated.

    That was the up side; the rest of an hour of speech followed by questions turned out to be mainly to do with local TV. Local in the sense of hyper-local; while regional television plugs on through a largely fallow period, the government’s excitement is about stations serving city-sized areas.

    This will take a major step forward in August on Hunt’s timetable of 2012 media events, which involves something happening every month except November which he is keeping free for his birthday. After news later this month of which of ten cities (including Bradford, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle and Sheffield) have been successful in bidding for enhanced urban broadband, 20 will be chosen in August to pioneer local TV licences.

    Quite how exciting this will be remains to be seen. One precondition is at least an hour of broadcasting a day which doesn’t sound quite like the sense of a real local dawn which greeted the birth of Yorkshire Television in that blessed year 1968. There are also sceptics about how many companies will be interested in the opportunity.

    Undeterred, Hunt said that there were 90 at least, promoted the new scheme as more ‘granular’ than the 1968 regions, and declared that 2012 would be ‘the year of local television.’ He saw no reason why the UK should not match Italy’s 600 local TV outfits or the 1800 which provide 60,000 jobs in the US, praised the enthusiasm of local universities (Salford is behind the nations and regions conference) and said that local papers were increasingly interested in getting involved. On that score he noted:

    The elephant in the room at the Leveson Inquiry is that newspapers are not making money.

    He also reminded some 300 delegates at the magnificent rehearsal hall for the BBC Philharmonic, decorated in off-white, lilac and pink and with eight timpani on stage, that we live in a transformed, digital and internet era. Local TV would be run by ‘insurgents’, not international media firms on whose traditional financial models many of the doubts about viability were based.

    Questions included further scepticism based on the experiences of Channel M in Manchester and fears about local TV’s effect on already-embattled local radio. Hunt revealed that indie producers will now be allowed to hold local TV licences, thanks to an exemption for small-scale services in EU monopoly regulations. He sidestepped a request that he express an opinion on James Murdoch’s suitability to run a media operation and also the rumour that his department might follow the BBC north.

    That really would deal a passionate blow to London-centricity, as would the siting of the new press/media regulator at Salford Quays. But Hunt said:

    I’ve had an excellent tour of the facilities here and they are marvellous, but there doesn’t seem to be any room left.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

     

    This article titled “China suspected of Facebook attack on Nato’s supreme allied commander” was written by Nick Hopkins in Washington, for The Observer on Saturday 10th March 2012 13.07 UTC

    Nato’s most senior military commander has been repeatedly targeted in a Facebook scam thought to have been co-ordinated by cyber-spies in China, the Observer has learned. The spies are suspected of being behind a campaign to glean information about Admiral James Stavridis from his colleagues, friends and family, sources say.

    This involved setting up fake Facebook accounts bearing his name in the hope that those close to him would be lured into making contact or answering private messages, potentially giving away personal details about Stavridis or themselves.

    This type of “social engineering” impersonation is an increasingly common web fraud. Nato said it wasn’t clear who was responsible for the spoof Facebook pages, but other security sources pointed the finger at China.

    Last year criminals in China were accused of being behind a similar operation, which was given the codename Night Dragon. This involved hackers impersonating executives at companies in the US, Taiwan and Greece so that they could steal business secrets.

    The latest disclosure will add to growing fears in the UK and US about the scale of cyber-espionage being undertaken by China. As well as targeting senior figures in the military, the tactic has been blamed for the wholesale theft of valuable intellectual property from some leading defence companies.

    The sophistication and relentlessness of these “advanced persistent threat” cyber attacks has convinced intelligence agencies on both sides of the Atlantic that they must have been state-sponsored. Nato has warned all its top officials about the dangers of being impersonated on social networking sites, and awarded a £40m contract to a major defence company to bolster security at the organisation’s headquarters and 50 other sites across Europe.

    A Nato official confirmed that Stavridis, who is supreme allied commander Europe (Saceur), had been targeted on several occasions in the past two years: “There have been several fake Saceur pages. Facebook has cooperated in taking them down … the most important thing is for Facebook to get rid of them.”

    The official added: “First and foremost, we want to make sure that the public is not being misinformed. Saceur and Nato have made significant policy announcements on either the Twitter or Facebook feed, which reflects Nato keeping pace with social media. It is important the public has trust in our social media.”

    Nato said it was now in regular contact with Facebook account managers and that the fake pages were usually deleted within 24 to 28 hours of being discovered. Finding the actual source in cases such as these is notoriously difficult, but another security source said: “The most senior people in Nato were warned about this kind of activity. The belief is that China is behind this.”

    Stavridis, who is also in charge of all American forces in Europe, is a keen user of social media. He has a genuine Facebook account, which he uses to post frequent messages about what he is doing, and where. Last year he used Facebook to declare that the military campaign in Libya was at an end.

    The threat posed by Chinese cyber activity has been causing mounting concern in the UK and the US, who judge it to be a systematic attempt to spy on governments and their militaries. They also accuse Beijing of being involved in the anonymous theft and transfer of massive quantities of data from the west.

    In a surprisingly pointed report to Congress last year, US officials broke with diplomatic protocol and for the first time challenged China directly on the issue. The National Counterintelligence Executive said Chinese hackers were “the world’s most active and persistent perpetrators of economic espionage”.

    It said China appeared to have been responsible for “an onslaught of computer network intrusions”. The report also claimed that Chinese citizens living abroad were being leaned on to provide “insider access to corporate networks to steal trade secrets”. The use of moles was, it said, a clear exploitation of people who might fear for relatives in China.

    Security analysts in Washington said they believed China had undertaken comprehensive cyber-surveillance of the computer networks that control much of America’s critical infrastructure.

    This has stoked a political debate on Capitol Hill, where Democrats and Republicans are locked in an ideological battle about how to tackle cyber threats. President Barack Obama wants to introduce regulation to ensure companies are taking it seriously, but that approach is opposed by Republicans, including Senator John McCain.

    James Lewis, a cyber expert from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies thinktank in Washington, said the time for dithering had passed. “We know that Russia and China have done the reconnaissance necessary to plan to attack US critical infrastructure,” he said. “You might think we should put protection of critical infrastructure at a slightly higher level. It is completely vulnerable.”

    Shawn Henry, executive assistant director at the FBI, told the Observer the agency was dealing with thousands of fresh attacks every month. “We recognise that there are vulnerabilities in infrastructure. That’s why we see breaches by the thousand every single month,” he said. “There are thousands of breaches every month across industry and retail infrastructure. We know that the capabilities of foreign states are substantial and we know the type of information that they are targeting.”

    The department of homeland security has been tasked by the White House with countering the cyber threat, but without making people lose confidence in the web. Its senior counsellor for cyber-security, Bruce McConnell, said: “The internet is civilian space. It is a marketplace. Like the market in Beirut in the 1970s, it will sometimes be a battleground. But its true nature is peaceful, and that must be preserved.”

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “BBC says technical problems will not delay Breakfast move to Salford” was written by Tara Conlan, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 7th March 2012 07.27 UTC

    BBC managers insist technical problems at its new Salford headquarters that have affected regional news programme North West Tonight will not delay the move of BBC Breakfast in April.

    New computer systems in news have caused what some sources claim is a “huge systemic problem that won’t be fixed for some time” at the BBC’s new northern base at MediaCityUK in Salford, while technology crashes in other departments are affecting shows such as Songs of Praise.

    Some insiders claim staff working on regional show North West Tonight, which will share a studio with BBC Breakfast, are “having to work under almost intolerable conditions”.

    However, the BBC journalism development editor, Rod Beards, said problems are just “snags” that will be ironed out ahead of Breakfast’s launch.

    BBC Breakfast’s transfer from London to Salford has hit the headlines already after presenters Sian Williams and Chris Hollins decided to leave the show rather than move.

    Hollins is among those who criticised the decision, claiming it was a “political” strategy rather than an economic one.

    Some celebrity PRs and bookers also criticised the move, saying it will prove difficult to find time for their clients to go to Salford and more Breakfast interviews will end up being conducted “down the line” from BBC studios in London.

    So with all eyes on the new BBC Breakfast, which is due to begin broadcasting from Salford shortly after Easter, managers are trying to “rescue the situation” and fix the technical problems, according to insiders.

    However, Beards played down the seriousness of the technical problems. “For me this is routine project stuff that is going on. It is low level snags that need fixing. What we are trying to ensure is that we’re not endangering the output,” he said.

    He declined to say when Breakfast will launch in Salford but said the technical issues will not affect the start date, which is thought to be around the week beginning Easter Monday.

    “There will be some annoyance to staff when something like the backup server falls over … it means double staffing,” Beards said. “But we will not be delaying the launch of Breakfast. This is fairly normal when you have new technology that some things will not work and we need to sort them out.”

    BBC’s children’s and Vision departments have already had technical problems since the move.

    In January a major computer crash led to shows such as Songs of Praise having to be edited by companies outside the BBC.

    According to sources there are ongoing issues with the corporation’s beleaguered new high-tech Digital Media Initiative, also known as Fabric, which is supposed to make production easier but is still being implemented and has cost millions of pounds.

    • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

    • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)
    Feb
    20

    Whitney Houston songs back in UK top 40

    Posted by: | Comments (0)

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Whitney Houston songs back in UK top 40″ was written by John Plunkett, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 20th February 2012 10.08 UTC

    Three Whitney Houston songs returned to the UK top 40 as more than 200,000 of the singer’s singles and albums were sold following the star’s death.

    I Will Always Love You hit number 14 in the official singles chart on Sunday, while I Wanna Dance With Somebody went in at number 20 and One Moment In Time took the number 40 spot.

    The singer – who was buried in Newark, New Jersey, on Saturday – was found submerged in the bath in her hotel room on the fourth floor of the Beverly Hilton in Los Angeles on 11 February.

    Some 200,000 of her records were bought last week, with 127,000 singles and more than 73,000 of her albums purchased online and in shops around the UK.

    There were 23 individual tracks by Houston in Sunday’s top 200 and 13% of tracks in the top 100 feature the late singer. Her 1992 film The Bodyguard made a re-entry on the Official Video Chart at number nine.

    Official Charts Company managing director Martin Talbot said: “The tragic death of Whitney Houston came as a shock to her friends, colleagues and music fans across the world.

    “Again, the British public is demonstrating its love of Whitney, just as it did for Amy Winehouse last year and Michael Jackson in 2009.”

    Houston, 48, was buried next to her father John at a brief private ceremony.

    Fans and onlookers watched as her coffin was driven in a gold hearse with red and white roses placed on the roof, with family and close following behind in cars of the same colour.

    It came after some of the biggest names in the music industry bid an emotional farewell to the singer at her funeral service at New Hope Baptist Church in Newark.

    Stevie Wonder, Alicia Keys, R Kelly and a host of gospel stars performed during the ceremony, while actor Kevin Costner fought back tears as he gave a moving eulogy.

    • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

    • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook.

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)

     

    Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Buccaneer Murdoch does it again by striking back to save the empire” was written by Roy Greenslade, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 20th February 2012 00.18 UTC

    When Rupert Murdoch began his counter-attack on Friday I quoted a wise old Sun staffer who said: “He’s done it again.”

    Well, he has done it yet again – surprising everyone by deciding to launch the Sun on Sunday next week.

    The wily old media tycoon has a habit of being at his best when he is at bay.

    I thought he had lost the plot when he appeared before the Commons select committee last year, especially after his sorry performance in the week following the Milly Dowler disclosure in July.

    Clearly, I was wrong because this gambit smacks of the Rupert of old. It will surely have his rivals gasping, leaving them little time to prepare.

    Undoubtedly, there will be more shocks along the way. Expect the first issue to be very cheaply priced indeed. Expect him to flood the market.

    Most of all, expect him to stay the course because this is about him rescuing his tarnished reputation.

    He knows that the arrests of 10 staff have not damaged the Sun in the eyes of the paper’s 2.7m buyers nor has it prompted any revolt among advertisers.

    The Sun brand therefore remains a saleable item. So the Sunday version will be unlikely to look anything like the News of the World.

    It will draw on the Sun itself, using the same logo and design in order to reinforce the “distance” from the paper he was forced to close.

    The fact that he feels he can pull it off also shows the strength of business buccaneers running papers rather than corporations.

    He might have to answer to shareholders in the States, but this is a backyard pastime as far as they are concerned. So the 80-year-old tycoon can do as he wishes.

    This astonishing initiative is all about one angry man, having suffered a setback that looked as if it might end in him sacrificing his British media interests, striking back to save his empire.

    It’s personal, not corporate. He wants to show his staff, the politicians, the rest of Fleet Street, the readers, News Corp’s investors – indeed, the world – that he will not go quietly.

    Love him or hate him, you have to admire the chutzpah. What a guy!

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

    Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

    Categories : Today's News
    Comments (0)